Tim Burns: A 'Better Deal' requires fair courts

Early this week, the Democratic Party’s congressional leadership announced their “Better Deal” program. With the program’s name harkening back to the Democratic Party’s central role in America’s economic success in the first three-quarters of the 20th century, the plan seeks to rebuild our once-strong middle-class economy by focusing on increasing wages, reducing costs for working families, building economic infrastructure, and lessening the power of big money in politics.

We also must keep in mind that the success of the Better Deal, like the success of all the Democratic Party’s earlier bargains with voters, will depend on America’s courts. The fair and impartial courts of the mid-20th century strengthened our democracy and middle-class economy by working with Congress and state legislatures to implement and enforce common-sense economic legislation that made our nation stronger for everyone.

For the past 40 years, however, right-wing judges have been chipping away at the laws that protected our democracy and our middle-class economy. Examples abound. John Kennedy’s New Frontier passed the Equal Pay Act, but women still receive much less pay for the same work as men because courts weakened the protections of that great law. Earlier generations of Americans, like our current generation, sought to keep money out of politics, but the United States Supreme Court’s decision in the Citizens United case made those efforts a dead letter. Here in Wisconsin, we passed the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act, forbidding employers from firing workers because of their age, but the right-wing majority of our Supreme Court made that law a hollow promise for parochial school teachers.